Impact of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment on Herbomineral Formulation in Different Skin Health Parameters
Mahendra Kumar Trivedi and Alice Branton and Dahryn Trivedi and Gopal Nayak and Deborah Lea Smith



Support
Academic Torrents!

Disable your
ad-blocker!

Impact of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment on Herbomineral Formulation in Different Skin Health Parameters.pdf652.88kB
Type: Paper
Tags: The Trivedi Effect®, Extracellular Matrix, Hyaluronic Acid, Scratch Assay, Consciousness Energy Healing, Skin Protection, Collagen, Elastin

Bibtex:
@article{,
title= {Impact of Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment on Herbomineral Formulation in Different Skin Health Parameters},
keywords= {Consciousness Energy Healing, The Trivedi Effect®, Skin Protection, Scratch Assay, Hyaluronic Acid, Extracellular Matrix, Collagen, Elastin},
journal= {American Journal of Biomedical and Life Sciences
},
author= {Mahendra Kumar Trivedi and Alice Branton and Dahryn Trivedi and Gopal Nayak and Deborah Lea Smith},
year= {2017},
url= {https://www.trivedieffect.com/the-science/biotech/publication/healers-science/skin-health/impact-of-consciousness-energy-healing-treatment-on-herbomineral-formulation-in-different-skin-health-parameters/
},
license= {Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
},
abstract= {The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Consciousness Energy Healing based test formulation and cell medium (DMEM) against various skin health parameters. The test formulation and DMEM were divided into two parts. One part received the Consciousness Energy Healing Treatment (The Trivedi Effect®) by Deborah Lea Smith and termed as the Biofield Energy Treated sample, while other part denoted as untreated test item. The study was assessed for the measurement of collagen, elastin, hyaluronic acid, melanin synthesis, cell viability against UV-B induced stress, and wound healing activity. MTT assay showed that the test formulation was safe and nontoxic in three cell lines. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) assay data showed that the percent cell proliferation was increased significantly by 22.69% and 34.99% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 8.75 µg/mL compared to the UT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation group. Collagen was increased by 15.12% and 15.26% in the BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.625 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Elastin was significantly increased by 9.10%, 13.71%, and 12.41% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation, BT-DMEM + Test formulation, and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 5 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Elastin was also increased significantly by 17.78% and 6.01% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 10 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Hyaluronic acid was significantly increased by 3.90%, 5.37%, and 6.82% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation at 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 µg/mL, respectively compared to the untreated group. Melanin level was reduced by 14.64% and 18.25% in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation and BT-DMEM + UT-Test formulation groups, respectively at 0.13 µg/mL compared to the untreated group. Skin cells protection was significantly increased by 21.32%, 23.81%, and 7.20% at 0.625, 1.25, and 2.5 µg/mL, respectively in the UT-DMEM + BT-Test formulation compared to the untreated group. Wound healing assay exhibited significant wound closure and cell migration in all the tested groups compared to the untreated group. Overall, the Biofield Energy Treated test formulation and DMEM (The Trivedi Effect®) were found to be safe and can be developed as an effective cosmetic product to protect and treat the skin problems including infection, photosensitivity, acne, hives, chickenpox, eczema, rosacea, seborrheic dermatitis, psoriasis, erythema, contact dermatitis, skin aging, wrinkles, etc.
},
superseded= {},
terms= {}
}