echoUNAL a benchmarking study for automatic classification of six echocardiographic views

folder echoUNAL (349 files)
filedata/metadata/Annotations_per_frame.csv 21.24kB
filedata/metadata/Patients_and_videos.csv 8.36kB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00001.avi 3.30MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00002.avi 6.56MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00003.avi 2.30MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00004.avi 2.33MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00005.avi 1.10MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00006.avi 16.09MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00007.avi 1.60MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00008.avi 7.75MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00009.avi 2.73MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00010.avi 11.99MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00011.avi 2.41MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00012.avi 1.18MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00013.avi 9.70MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00014.avi 13.45MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00015.avi 16.67MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00016.avi 46.53MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00017.avi 14.65MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00018.avi 19.48MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00019.avi 16.48MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00020.avi 26.38MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00021.avi 10.39MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00022.avi 15.85MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00023.avi 10.94MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00024.avi 6.95MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00025.avi 9.39MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00026.avi 14.20MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00027.avi 7.97MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00028.avi 6.13MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00029.avi 16.69MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00030.avi 14.00MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00031.avi 13.08MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00032.avi 13.57MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00033.avi 16.84MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00034.avi 16.47MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00035.avi 24.20MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00036.avi 11.25MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00037.avi 12.91MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00038.avi 11.98MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00039.avi 13.26MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00040.avi 14.94MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00041.avi 13.46MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00042.avi 11.52MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00043.avi 11.65MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00044.avi 16.16MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00045.avi 15.22MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00046.avi 19.33MB
filedata/videos/A4C/A4C_00047.avi 17.98MB
Too many files! Click here to view them all.
Type: Dataset
Tags:

Bibtex:
@article{,
title= {echoUNAL a benchmarking study for automatic classification of six echocardiographic views},
keywords= {},
author= {},
abstract= {# EchoUNAL Dataset & Classifier

This repository contains the dataset and resources for the paper, "The EchoCardiography open data base EchoUNAL: a benchmarking study for automatic classification of six echocardiographic views".

##  Description

The study presents a comparative evaluation of four CNN architectures for classifying six standard echocardiographic views:
* **A4C**: Apical Four Chamber 
* **A5C**: Apical Five Chamber 
* **PLAX**: Parasternal Long Axis 
* **PSAX**: Parasternal Short Axis 
* **S4C**: Subcostal Four Chambers
* **IVC**: Inferior Vena Cava 


##  Dataset Details

The database was created specifically for this study and is shared publicly to encourage further research.

* **Data Source**: The dataset was obtained from **89 healthy volunteers**, with informed consent from all participants.
* **Acquisition Hardware**: A **Butterfly iQ+** ultrasound device was used for image acquisition.
* **Acquisition Protocol**: Images were captured by two cardiologists specializing in echocardiography. Some videos were excluded due to poor acoustic window quality.
* **Total Contents**: The final dataset comprises **346 videos**, distributed as follows:
    * **A4C**: 61 videos 
    * **A5C**: 49 videos 
    * **PLAX**: 66 videos 
    * **PSAX**: 61 videos 
    * **S4C**: 54 videos 
    * **IVC**: 55 videos

##  Data Collection & Preprocessing

* **Original Format**: Videos were stored in `.AVI` format with a `500x500` pixel resolution. The original frame rate varied between 26 and 30 fps.
* **Applied Preprocessing**:
    1.  The ultrasound interface was cropped to center the cardiac image area.
    2.  The frame rate was standardized to **30 fps** using interpolation.
    3.  A manual, frame-level relabeling was performed to ensure label accuracy. A **"no view"** label was used for frames without a clear view, though this class was later excluded from the training setup due to its high heterogeneity.
    4.  All video frames were resized to **224x224** pixels, a standard input size for the pretrained CNN architectures.

##  Acknowledgments
This work was funded by the project "Estimation of cardiac work as an index of cardiovascular function in echocardiographic videos" with code 60946 from the call for research projects SUE Distrito Capital of 2023.






J. D. S. Avila et al., "The EchoCardiography open data base EchoUNAL: a benchmarking study for automatic classification of six echocardiographic views," 2025 21st International Symposium on Biomedical Image Processing and Analysis (SIPAIM), Pasto, Colombia, 2025, pp. 1-4, doi: 10.1109/SIPAIM67325.2025.11283340.
keywords: {Training;Visualization;Ultrasonic imaging;Systematics;Echocardiography;Computational modeling;Benchmark testing;Convolutional neural networks;Videos;Residual neural networks},},
terms= {},
license= {},
superseded= {},
url= {https://gitlab.com/JSarmientoA/echoUNAL}
}


Send Feedback